Alan Johnson’s Response to Urgent Question on Professor David Nutt

Tue, Nov 17, 2009

news from westminster

2 November 2009

“Mr Speaker, there should be no question that since its establishment in 1971, the independent and expert advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs has been invaluable to the successive governments it has served.

 

Later today, this House will consider imposing greater controls on the party drug, GBL, BZP and synthetic cannabinoids – all in accordance with advice from the Council.

 

Of the 21 recommendations the Council made in its report: Cannabis and Public Health, published in April 2008, the Home Office accepted 20 and rejected one on classification. Of the 13 recommendations made in its report on Ecstasy in February 2009, the Home Office accepted 11 of them and rejected 2 – one on classification and the other on its recommendation to explore a national scheme to enable drug testing of Ecstasy tablets and powders for people’s personal use

 

I asked Professor Nutt to resign as my principal drugs adviser, not because of the work of the Council but because of his failure to recognise that as chair of ACMD, his role is to advise rather than undermine government policy on drugs.

 

In February, whilst awaiting publication of the Government’s position on the classification of Ecstasy, of which he was already aware, Professor Nutt published an article and addressed the media on the appropriateness or otherwise of the government’s policy framework, expressing a view that horse-riding was more dangerous than ecstasy.

 

On Thursday 29 October, Professor Nutt chose without prior notification to my department to initiate a debate on drugs policy in the national media, accusing my predecessor of “distorting and devaluing” scientific research. As a result, I have lost confidence in Professor Nutt’s ability to be my principal adviser on drugs.

 

His dismissal is not a reflection on the work of the committee. I have since been in contact with the committee and have agreed to meet them in the very near future.

 

There is no doubt in my mind that advice of independent, scientific advisers is essential to many aspects of the government’s work. During my time as Secretary of State for Health I had the privilege of working with Professor Sir Liam Donaldson and Professor John Beddington, and at Trade and Industry with Professor Sir David King. The role of such advisers is to provide independent advice to government based on their professional, scientific expertise. The role of government is to consider that advice carefully, along with all other relevant factors, and for this House to endorse or reject those decisions where appropriate”.

Leave a Reply